# Extending Phase 1 Testnet Whitelist: User Expansion Before Launch **URL:** \ **Category:** Stabilizer Discussions\ **Tags:** phase-1, feedback\ **Created:** [June 7, 2026, 12:42pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446 "2026-06-07T12:42:15Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![arthur](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/arthur/32/533_2.png) [@arthur](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/arthur)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 12:42pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/1 "2026-06-07T12:42:15Z")
* * * ## **Extending Phase 1 Testnet Whitelist: Community Expansion Before Launch** ![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/uploads/stabilizer/original/1X/69f0065cc7d412e726106e28449fe09db5d5bdc2.jpeg) **Status: Open for Community Feedback** 💬 * * * We’ve been evaluating the possibility of extending Phase 1 Testnet whitelist access to reach more of our community, and we believe this is the right strategic move before Phase 1 launch. ### **Rationale** As Stabilizer has grown, we’ve seen: - **Strong community interest from newer members** - People who discovered Stabilizer after Phase 1 allocation and have become active contributors - **Geographic expansion** - Community growth across regions that had limited testnet participation initially - **Institutional interest** - Organizations exploring how Stabilizer’s zero-slippage mechanics work for their infrastructure - **Demand for testnet access** - More people wanting to test zero-slippage mechanics firsthand Rather than keeping the Phase 1 Testnet extremely limited, we’re opening it up slightly further to build on this momentum and strengthen the protocol before more advanced stages. * * * ### **Your Beta Tester Status Remains Valuable** **This extension doesn’t dilute the value of being an early beta tester.** You’ve earned your Beta Tester role through early participation and contribution. That credential stands. Your accumulated experience, and your position in the community are not affected by this expansion. ![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/uploads/stabilizer/original/1X/5bf846badd8d92e96f08b06d9c77aa1b8103e0e2.jpeg) Adding more participants strengthens the protocol without diminishing what you’ve already built. For a deeper dive on what the Beta Tester role means, check out our Medium article: [https://medium.com/@info\_64583/deep-dive-the-beta-tester-role-45c2369d957b](https://medium.com/@info_64583/deep-dive-the-beta-tester-role-45c2369d957b) * * * ### **Why This Matters for the Protocol** **Early supporters remain first-class users.** New entries are complementary participants, not competitors. Expanding Phase 1 Testnet strengthens the protocol by validating your early decision to test Stabilizer and building a more resilient community heading into more advanced stages. * * * ### **What We’ve Accomplished in Transition Phase** Before expanding further, we’ve already validated our community-driven approach: ![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/uploads/stabilizer/original/1X/202888ccc392895a7250cfa6b6fcf38f1b99d295.jpeg) **Structured Community Feedback** We surveyed 4,000+ beta participants to understand what matters. The results shaped our roadmap and confirmed the product status. Read the full analysis: [https://medium.com/@info\_64583/stabilizer-beta-testnet-community-feedback-report-0c1beff5e410](https://medium.com/@info_64583/stabilizer-beta-testnet-community-feedback-report-0c1beff5e410) **Risk Framework Published** We released a comprehensive framework for evaluating and onboarding new stablecoins. This transparent process ensures every asset is rigorously assessed before joining Stabilizer: [Stabilizer Risk Framework: Onboarding New Stablecoins](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/stabilizer-risk-framework-onboarding-new-stablecoins/181) **First Asset Approved** PYUSD (PayPal’s stablecoin) passed our risk framework and community review. The P-Pool is ready for Phase 1 live, proving our asset evaluation process works: [PYUSD Approval: Consensus Reached](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/pyusd-approval-consensus-reached/422) These wins show what’s possible when the community guides protocol decisions. * * * ### **The Concrete Benefits** Expanding Phase 1 Testnet strengthens the protocol by: - Increasing the diversity of feedback you’ll receive - Creating more transaction flow for you to benefit from - Building a stronger community heading into mainnet - Giving you the chance to mentor newer participants * * * ### **Benefits of Whitelist Extension** ![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/uploads/stabilizer/original/1X/260331997ca1da138d3559a698bafa8eb8f6d61e.jpeg) #### **Protocol Validation** - **Stress-test with larger participation** - More users equals more transactions, better data on mechanism performance - **Diverse trading patterns** - Zero-slippage design validated across different user behaviors, strategies, and participation levels - **Better edge-case discovery** - Larger user base surfaces issues earlier, before mainnet #### **Community Health** - **Inclusive growth** - More community members get direct access to test the protocol - **Global representation** - Better participation across time zones and regions - **Stronger feedback loop** - More voices equals more comprehensive protocol feedback #### **Network Effects** - **Use case diversity** - Different types of traders and LPs test different protocol aspects - **Community stickiness** - Participants who test early stay engaged longer - **Organic advocacy** - More testnet users means more people sharing their experience #### **Product Improvement** - **Better UX testing** - Larger beta group identifies UI and documentation gaps faster - **Risk assessment validation** - More users testing multiple stablecoin pairs simultaneously - **Launch confidence** - More data, more validation, stronger mainnet readiness #### **Launch Readiness** - **Confidence in infrastructure** - Larger testnet load equals higher confidence for mainnet - **Team preparedness** - More feedback equals a better prepared team - **Documentation refinement** - More users equals more clarity and completeness * * * ### **Testnet Priority List** We’re moving through Phase 1 in stages to maximize protocol validation and community participation: ![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/uploads/stabilizer/original/1X/b6bac8680c069d73fb9298ac256041cbaa1ff03e.jpeg) **Current Stage: Transition Phase (Transition from Beta to Phase 1)** - ✅ Gathered structured feedback from 4,000+ participants - ✅ Published Risk Framework for asset evaluation - ✅ Approved first new asset (PYUSD) through community consensus - Extending Phase 1 Testnet whitelist to reach more community and institutional participants - Maximum 48-hour window for whitelist extension - Screening process ensures legitimate participation - Maximum of 50,000 total participants (including already whitelisted users) **Next: Phase 1 Launch Date Announcement** - Once whitelist extension closes, we’ll communicate the exact Phase 1 launch date - Community will have clear visibility on when testnet goes live **Final: Phase 1 Launch** - Full testnet live with all participants - Begin stress-testing mechanisms at scale - Gather comprehensive feedback before mainnet * * * ### **The Process** **Timeline:** Maximum 48-hour whitelist window (matching the original Phase 1 allocation window) **Limit:** Max 50,000 total participants (including already whitelisted users) **Screening Process:** - Automated checks for duplicate accounts, suspicious patterns, and bot behavior - Manual review of entries to verify legitimate community participation **Fairness:** All entries treated equally after screening approval. First-come, first-served basis with automated filtering. * * * ### **What This Doesn’t Change** ![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/uploads/stabilizer/original/1X/24c0d2a924a4a2ffd7d5172bce39de78db593706.jpeg) - ✅ Beta Testers maintain their Phase 1 Testnet access and status - ✅ No removal of existing whitelist spots - ✅ All participants subject to same risk framework and safeguards - ✅ Beta Tester role remains exclusive to early participants * * * ### **Community Input** Feel free to drop your feedback below. 🛡 **Note:** The whitelist extension is **not open yet**. At this stage, we’re simply gathering community feedback and gauging interest. Details regarding any potential extension of the whitelist will be announced separately. ---
**Author:** ![JimmyOgb12](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e68b1a/32.png) [@JimmyOgb12](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/JimmyOgb12)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 1:06pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/2 "2026-06-07T13:06:42Z")
Extending Phase 1 Testnet whitelist access will be cool ---
**Author:** ![Graphixel](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/graphixel/32/97_2.png) [@Graphixel](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/Graphixel)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 1:09pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/3 "2026-06-07T13:09:00Z")
Looks clear and solid, looking forward to see with more contributor. Thanks for update ---
**Author:** ![djony](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/8dc957/32.png) [@djony](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/djony)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 1:11pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/4 "2026-06-07T13:11:39Z")
The main thing is that the expansion of the list of testers does not detract from the merits of the first testers. And so it’s better for the project - more testers, more load on the network. ---
**Author:** ![Diba](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/diba/32/147_2.png) [@Diba](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/Diba)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 1:48pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/5 "2026-06-07T13:48:41Z")
Excellent decision. Expanding to 50k max while protecting Beta Tester status is fair and strategic. This will help surface more edge cases and improve UX before mainnet. smart move, you gotta love stabilizer ---
**Author:** ![WinnerMan](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/winnerman/32/448_2.png) [@WinnerMan](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/WinnerMan)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 2:08pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/6 "2026-06-07T14:08:53Z")
It’s a good move. Let’s see how this improve the Stabilizer ecosystem ---
**Author:** ![WizardX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/wizardx/32/449_2.png) [@WizardX](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/WizardX)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 2:12pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/7 "2026-06-07T14:12:59Z")
Basically, the team is doing everything right, and I understand that the greater the load on the protocol, the better. The main thing is that they would be ready. My personal opinion, I would refrain from increasing the list. Quality is better than quantity. There are both pros and cons. Well, let’s see what happens next. Looking forward to the opening of Phase 1 🫡 ---
**Author:** ![Meektender](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7bcc69/32.png) [@Meektender](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/Meektender)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 3:33pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/8 "2026-06-07T15:33:36Z")
I think this is the right move. A mechanism is only proven when it performs under scale, not just under limited participation. More users mean better stress testing, more transaction diversity, and a higher chance of discovering edge cases before launch. As long as early beta contributors keep their recognition, expanding participation ultimately strengthens the protocol. ---
**Author:** ![Adebayo\_Adekunle](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/adebayo_adekunle/32/75_2.png) [@Adebayo\_Adekunle](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/Adebayo_Adekunle)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 3:45pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/9 "2026-06-07T15:45:46Z")
I’m proud to be along though. I’m hopping stablizer really go for an advanced Dex whereby user will be able to fully control their assets. Futures trading activities should also be available so that some trading money can be generated for continuous running of the Dex. Kudos to the whole community along with us (testers) ---
**Author:** ![BlamelessXBT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/blamelessxbt/32/327_2.png) [@BlamelessXBT](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/BlamelessXBT)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 3:55pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/10 "2026-06-07T15:55:51Z")
Totally agreed in all​💯👍 ---
**Author:** ![bbhalifa](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/bbhalifa/32/17_2.png) [@bbhalifa](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/bbhalifa)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 4:06pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/11 "2026-06-07T16:06:01Z")
Greatest project đź’Żđź’Żđź’Żâś… ---
**Author:** ![ChainLord](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/13edae/32.png) [@ChainLord](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/ChainLord)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 4:22pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/12 "2026-06-07T16:22:40Z")
But why not just go straight to public testnet? ---
**Author:** ![Jubbic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/8dc957/32.png) [@Jubbic](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/Jubbic)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 5:07pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/13 "2026-06-07T17:07:19Z")
This is not a bad idea nice work team ---
**Author:** ![Sports\_Line](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/sports_line/32/45_2.png) [@Sports\_Line](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/Sports_Line)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 5:17pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/14 "2026-06-07T17:17:31Z")
This approach strikes the perfect balance between fairness and security. The 48-hour window gives everyone a realistic chance to join, while automated and manual screening ensures bots and duplicate accounts don’t steal spots from real community members. Respecting the original Phase 1 allocation window also shows consistency and integrity. A fair, well-designed system that puts genuine participants first. ---
**Author:** ![McMe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/mcme/32/61_2.png) [@McMe](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/McMe)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 5:17pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/15 "2026-06-07T17:17:33Z")
Expanding Phase 1 Testnet participation to a maximum of 50K users is a reasonable step. However, a structured expansion framework should be maintained to manage the expected surge in demand during the 48-hour window. Keep building. ---
**Author:** ![Msabar](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/msabar/32/648_2.png) [@Msabar](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/Msabar)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 5:27pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/16 "2026-06-07T17:27:04Z")
This is good project,let’s build together ---
**Author:** ![Blackclef](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8c91f0/32.png) [@Blackclef](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/Blackclef)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 5:30pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/17 "2026-06-07T17:30:17Z")
It’s a good move imo, will be nice if stabilizer can be more strict in the aspect of controlling bad actors, not to game the system, I hopes for future rewards. To me I’d say extension isn’t necessary but reading through the reasons why it’s needed, I agree with the idea. I want the best for stabilizer. ---
**Author:** ![QSBashirloved](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/qsbashirloved/32/609_2.png) [@QSBashirloved](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/QSBashirloved)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 5:35pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/18 "2026-06-07T17:35:11Z")
Can’t wait to join extending phase 1. Keep building. ---
**Author:** ![OjWeb3](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/ojweb3/32/47_2.png) [@OjWeb3](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/OjWeb3)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 5:47pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/19 "2026-06-07T17:47:59Z")
More contributors, yes bring it on Great idea ---
**Author:** ![Balams](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/balams/32/675_2.png) [@Balams](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/Balams)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 7:37pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446/20 "2026-06-07T19:37:59Z")
That is a welcome development. We need more users to help stress test the network. [Next page](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/extending-phase-1-testnet-whitelist-user-expansion-before-launch/446.md?page=2)