# Korea Blockchain Week Reinforced Why Stablecoin Trading Needs Better Infrastructure **URL:** \ **Category:** General\ **Tags:** community\ **Created:** [October 7, 2026, 8:18am UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/korea-blockchain-week-reinforced-why-stablecoin-trading-needs-better-infrastructure/862 "2026-10-07T08:18:29Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 9
**Author:** ![josecrypto](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex048/user_avatar/stabilizer.discourse.group/josecrypto/32/580_2.png) [@josecrypto](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/u/josecrypto)\ **Post date:** [October 13, 2026, 5:12pm UTC](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/korea-blockchain-week-reinforced-why-stablecoin-trading-needs-better-infrastructure/862/9 "2026-10-13T17:12:17Z")
> [@Roomey](#): > > Size is punished in DeFi, so big trades leave This is the point that matters most for the next phase, @Roomey . Zero slippage solves price impact, but it only holds within available capacity, so the real test for keeping large flows onchain is how fast that capacity can grow. That’s why Capacity Vaults look like the key piece for Phase 2. The other half is trust in the assets themselves. Large flows won’t stay onchain if the risk side isn’t solid, which is why the depth of the [USDT0 Risk Assessment](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/usdt0-risk-assessment-for-stabilizer/710) is a good sign. Infrastructure for big trades has to cover both execution and asset risk. --- _[View the full topic](https://stabilizer.discourse.group/t/korea-blockchain-week-reinforced-why-stablecoin-trading-needs-better-infrastructure/862)._